🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding that remarks delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents American, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Instead, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all love a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He said in press after the loss that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and concussive strength on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is often overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and grace of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

The American's play in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not only express his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {